
Golden Shiners (Notemigonus crysoleucas)
Utilizing Bowfin (Amia Calva) Nest as Spawning Site
By Ray Katula
reprinted from American Currents, Fall 1994
Numerous fish species, primarily minnows, have been observed utilizing other species'
prepared nests for depositing their own eggs. Nest-association spawning is the term
generally applied to such behavior. Redbelly daces (Phoxinus), Rosyface Shiners,
Cardinal Shiners, Golden Shiners--these are but a few examples of
"freeloaders-". "Host" species include Hornyhead Chubs, sunfishes,
lampreys, and other types of nest-building species. To me, this fascinating social
behavior takes the study of nature to a higher plane. More and more, we learn of causes
and effects of species interaction in our streams--arguments for maintaining aquatic
biodiversity.
The purpose of this article is to document an instance in which Golden Shiners
deposited their eggs in a Bowfin nest. Golden Shiners have been observed laying their eggs
in the nest of a Largemouth Bass (Kramer and Smith 1960). But, according to Lawrence M.
Page, no documentation exists on any species of fish utilizing a Bowfin nest for spawning.
On May 11, 1994, I was walking down the shallow margins of a small, heavily vegetated
pond. The unnamed pond was once normally a slough of the Upper Mississippi River, but
railroad dikes were constructed many years ago severing most ties with the main river. (A
river no longer flows through it.) Amid muck and vegetation, I discerned some
splashing noises that alerted me to the nest. I headed onto land and approached from
there--my preferred method, to avoid scaring the adult Bowfin. When I could survey the
shoreline nest, I noted that it was typically Bowfinlike, situated in a shallow, nearly
circular depression 1' deep and 2-1/2' feet in diameter. The flooded terrestrial grasses
on the nest site had been shorn off, with only the tangled roots remaining. Untypical of
many Bowfin nests, there were no overhanging bushes, trees, or vegetation above it. This
slight aberration enhanced my vantage point considerably.
The activities I observed were relatively brief. The entire sequence lasted about 30
seconds. I saw approximately 25 to 30 Golden Shiners, mostly about 3" long, swimming
around the inside of the Bowfin nest. Depending upon how the Bowfin body broke up the
school, there would be two or three units of them. For the most part, the Golden Shiners
swam one or two inches inside the perimeter of the nest and avoided the middle. Vegetation
prevented them from swimming easily over the sides of the nest, which was only open to
deeper waters for a very short part of the perimeter.
Initially, the male Bowfin was facing toward the entry area of his nest, directly out
towards deeper portions of the pond. I will designate this the 12:00 position, I was
positioned to the right of the nest, about the 5:00 position. The Golden Shiners were
swimming in tight schools and understandably avoiding the head regions of the male Bowfin.
As the Bowfin moved to various positions, the Golden Shiners remained clear of his head
region, but they quickly filled any unoccupied areas and appeared to spawn quickly in
those areas. From the 12:00 position, the Bowfin turned away from me to a 10:00 position,
then to a 7:00 position. He then made a wide right turn all the way to about the 2:00
position, at which time he spotted me and swam off to deeper water, abandoning the nest.
This move also scared away the Golden Shiners. Surprisingly, many of them had not been
aware of my presence; they seemed preoccupied with spawning and avoiding becoming lunch at
the same time. It did not seem to me as if the Bowfin was interested in consuming the
shiners; his primary goal appeared to be protecting the nest.
After all this turmoil, curiosity replaced my astonishment. I knelt down for a closer
look at the nest. Sure enough, there were two types of eggs in the nest. The much larger,
black eggs I identified as Bowfin eggs, and outnumbering them were the apparent Golden
Shiner eggs. While some readers might suggest that another species of minnow had laid
them, it's unlikely that my identification would have been mistaken. This pond is well
isolated from all sources of water. The last time an outside water source penetrated this
pond was the horrendous flood of 1966. The flood wiped out the railroad dikes, and the
long-excluded Mississippi poured in.
My parents' house, where I grew up, was immediately above, on the bluffs. I had sampled
this pond extensively over the years. Of course there are no fish left, as regulatory
agencies say we collectors can devastate and wipe out species by overcollecting. NOT! This
pond is still full of all past species despite this writer's youthful and foolish
overcollection. In any case, this pond had been sampled extensively by the author, and the
only two other species of cyprinids ever turned up in my nets were Common Carp (Cyprinus
carpio) and Fathead Minnows (Pimephales promelas). Carp spawn at a much larger
size than these cyprinid spawners, and Fathead Minnows spawn in a completely different
manner.
Before going home, I picked up four samples--two from the nest and two outside of it,
the latter as controls. One 4"x4" nest sample was taken to be preserved, another
to hatch the cyprinid eggs. One control sample was taken 8" away from the nest, same
depth, and another control sample was taken 3' away, at the same relative position from
the shoreline and at the same depth. One nest sample and 8" control sample were
preserved in alcohol. The 3' sample was frozen, and the other nest sample was used to
obtain eggs. I collected 36 cyprinid eggs and 17 Bowfin eggs from an approximate
4"x4" sample of the nest.
I placed the Golden Shiner eggs into a hatching tray, added methylene blue, and aerated
the mix. At 63oF, the eggs hatched on May 15th, 16th, and 17th. Of the 36 eggs
taken, only 15 fry hatched. For several days post-hatching, the larval fry appeared to
have some type of gluing glands attaching them to the bottom of the hatching tray. The fry
were then placed into a ten-gallon aquarium for rearing after several fry were preserved.
Having reared tank-spawned Golden Shiners in aquaria previously, I knew that the fry
would grow slowly. Indeed, these were no exception. In September, the fry appeared large
enough to be identifiable. I sent them to the Illinois Natural History Survey for
identification. No attempt was made to hatch the Bowfin eggs; there could be no confusion.
Five days after my original nest observations, I revisited the Bowfin nest. I wanted to
find out several things. Since my captive eggs had hatched, would there be more, newly
laid Golden Shiner eggs? Would the Bowfin eggs have hatched yet? I thought for sure that I
would sight unhatched eggs of some kind, but I noted that the Bowfin eggs had hatched, and
aside from fungused eggs, I did not observe any more Golden Shiner eggs. There were many
very small, young fry swimming at the surface over the nest. These I presumed were the
newly hatched Golden Shiner fry. If I lay still long enough observing the nest, I could
discern the newly hatched Bowfin fry rising to the surface of the water obtaining their
gulp of atmospheric air. These were easily differentiated from the presumed Golden Shiner
fry. Were the Golden Shiner fry hanging around the nest benefiting from the protection of
the Bowfin male? Or did they end up as food for the Bowfin fry? At this time, I took
several photographs of the Bowfin nest. Interestingly, another Bowfin nest observed during
this time did not contain Golden Shiner eggs (that I could discern).
Conclusions
Apparently Golden Shiners on occasion utilize the nests of Bowfins for depositing their
eggs. Also, since it is not a common occurrence, one must wonder if there are a variety of
conditions or elements that entice the Golden Shiners to commence spawning. The day when I
observed this occurrence was relatively warm for that time of year and sunny for the most
part. Male Bowfins always appear emaciated while guarding their nest, and perhaps, like
many other species of fish, refrain from eating during this period of time. After
hatching, do the shiner fry benefit from the protection of the Bowfin male much as
Orangethroat Darter fry hatched in a Smallmouth Bass' nest benefit from its protection?
Perhaps further field research may find further answers. Whether or not my observations
are new to science, it was a real joy to observe this nest-association behavior, and I can
only hope that I will have further opportunities in the future.
References
Pflieger, William, 1966. Copeia, No, 1, Ichthyological Notes, Young of the Orangethroat
Darter (Etheostoma spectabile) in nest of the Smallmouth Bass (Micropterus
dolomieu).
Robison, Henry, and Buchanan, Thomas, 1987. Fishes of Arkansas, The University of
Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701.
Page, Lawrence M., personal communication, May 16, 1994.
Used with permission. Article copyright retained by author.
|