
Observations on Aquarium Maintenance of the Skilletfish, Gobiesox strumosus
By C.A.E. Bergesen
reprinted from American Currents, Oct. 1982
An interesting fish little known to aquarists, the skilletfish, Gobiesox strumosus
Cope, enjoys wide distribution in tidal waters on the East Coast from the mid-Atlantic
states to Florida (Hildebrand and Schroeder 1927). There are a large number of
Gobiesocids--or clingfish, as they are commonly known--found worldwide in both temperate
and tropical coastal waters.
Relatively little work has been done on the species, insofar as can be determined.
Several papers dealing with the life history and ecology of the skilletfish are available
(Martin and Martin 1972, Runyan 1962, Saksena and Joseph 1972), with the Runyan paper by
far the most ambitious. Other ecological data can be inferred from such works as the
revision of the genus published by Schultz (1944). Hildebrand and Schroeder (1927) also
provide a limited amount of ecological data.
According to Runyan (1962), the skilletfish is nearly always closely associated with
empty oyster shells, which provide the main spawning location for the fish. Skilletfish
have also been captured in eel grass flats in company with sticklebacks and other fish
(Runyan 1962). While this species has been collected by trawl at 110 feet (Hildebrand and
Schroeder 1927), it should certainly be considered a shallow-water, benthic species.
Near Chesapeake Bay
Several years ago, I began my first experiences maintaining skilletfish after bringing
home some half-dozen specimens from a collecting trip to the lower Rappahannock River in
Virginia's Northern Neck. These clingfish were captured in shallow, somewhat turbid waters
that reach temperatures in the mid-70s by the end of summer. Salinity varies widely,
as the collection site is only two miles upstream from the Chesapeake Bay.
The skilletfish were caught immediately offshore using a hand net dragged up the face
of a clay shelf about 18" high. The bottom in this area, only two feet under at low
tide, is composed of sand with some silt. The top of the clay shelf is dry at low tide.
Higher plants are entirely absent, though various kinds of algae (both red and green) are
to be found floating and attached at the shoreline. In the immediate vicinity of this
collection site live a blenny (probably Chasmodes bosquainus, the banded blenny)
and a killifish (probably Fundulus heteroclitus); grass shrimp (Palaemonetes
sp.); juvenile blue crabs; and lots of sea nettles, which tend to make summer collecting
trips difficult on occasion.
Odd-looking
Once captured and examined closely, clingfish can hardly be mistaken for any other
fish. They have a broad body, depressed anteriorly, with small eyes set on top close to
the mouth. The dorsal and ventral fins are set fairly far back on the body. By far the
most notable physical attribute of the family (Gobiesocidae) is the enormous sucking disc,
a modification of the pelvic fins, which enables individuals to cling securely to almost
any surface.
Seen from above, skilletfish look much like large tadpoles. Color is extremely variable
and the fish darken and lighten rapidly depending on substrate. Various blotches, bars,
and stripes may be present. On a sandy or silty bottom, they are difficult to see.
Also notable is the large mouth equipped with remarkably strong teeth. Adults are
capable of giving a good pinch, especially when they enter their "feeding
frenzy," but more on that later. According to several accounts of the feeding habits
of skilletfish in the wild, their diet seems to consist primarily of amphipods and isopods
with an occasional annelid (Runyan 1962). They appear to be entirely carnivorous. In the
aquarium, skilletfish are not loath to attack organisms of their own size.
According to Runyan (1962), skilletfish spawn in late June and July, and large numbers
of juveniles may be collected in late summer. Newly collected specimens acclimate smoothly
to aquarium conditions. I have kept them both in slightly, brackish water (1 to 5 ppt) and
in aquarium-strength seawater. Their dissolved-oxygen requirements seem to be relatively
low, on the basis of not very scientific observations that they are the last to die in a
collecting bucket. Saksena and Joseph (1972) found that skilletfish larvae had a lower
oxygen demand than larvae of two other common estuarine fish found in the same locale.
Temperature would also seem to be relatively unimportant. In short, physiologically,
skilletfish appear to be fairly durable estuarine organisms.
Aquarium Care
While Gobiesox strumosus is a small fish (maximum length of my specimens
was 2 to 2-1/2 inches), they should probably not be kept in tanks much smaller than 15
gallons. A bottom of Number One fine gravel with chunks of tufa, coral rock, and oyster
shells has proven satisfactory. The fish become more territorial as they grow, so ample
cover is necessary. They were observed to be aggressive towards each other; after raising
some to adult size, I began to experience losses, probably from overcrowding and resultant
fighting. Skilletfish proved to be fairly active during the day, a conclusion not in
agreement with Runyan (1962).
Feeding skilletfish is simplicity itself. My specimens ate everything that was offered
to them, including flake food, frozen food, frozen brine shrimp, chunks of smelt, fresh
fish of various kinds, and various pelleted food. When their tank was being fed, the
skilletfish would dart from their caves and hiding places and cluster on the glass at the
water line. There, with much splashing and excitement they would wait to seize the
incoming viands, which were promptly devoured, or, if too large, were taken to the bottom
to be worked over at leisure.
G. strumosus has proven to be a good community fish despite its gluttonous
appetite. I have kept them in a temperate, brackish community tank (killies, blennies, and
grass shrimp) and in a 65-gallon tropical marine tank fully equipped--undergravel and
outside power filtration; a layer of four to six inches of coral rubble, dolomite and
crushed oyster shells; and numerous chunks of coral rock interspersed with coral heads,
etc. Inhabiting the tank at the time were only a few small fish and crustaceans.
The first sign of impending reproductive activity was a series of short chases around
the tank by a pair of the skilletfish. This went on for a week or so, after which one of
the skilletfish, the largest, was seen to be keeping to one corner of the tank a great
deal of the time. The fish would sit in one place whipping its tail back and forth and
generally appearing agitated (prespawning agitation by gravid females is reported by
Runyan (1962)). A closer look after several days of this activity revealed that the
skilletfish was brooding a large number of eggs which had been placed on the uplift tube
of the undergravel filter. It was not possible to say how long the eggs had been present.
Skilletfish are reported to be paternal brooders (Runyan 1962).
Finally, the normal morning inspection revealed that the tank was full of hundreds of
free-swimming fry. I immediately attempted to feed them brine shrimp nauplii, but lost all
the fry within 72 hours. This experience parallels that reported by Runyan (1962), who was
unable to raise the fry past the four- or five-day mark, and with that of Martin and
Martin (1972), who reported that fry lived from three to five days. In smaller containers
with a higher concentration of food organisms, it should be possible to raise a fair
number of young.
I have recently started keeping these clingfish again after a gap of some two years.
Interestingly enough, they have always proven to be a popular item in my fish room. In
fact, I have been able to sell them in a local pet shop on occasion. They are perfect for
breaking in new marine tanks, since they are good producers of filter food.
Skilletfish, and undoubtedly other gobiesocids, make good aquarium residents. They have
much to commend themselves to aquarists with access to estuarine waters.
Skilletfish References
Hildebrand, S.F. and W.C. Schroeder. 1928. Fishes of the Chesapeake Bay. Bull. U.S.
Bureau Fish, 43 (1):1-38.
Martin, R.A. and C.L. Martin. 1970. Reproduction of the clingfish, Gobiesox
strumosus, Quart. Jour. Florida Acad. Sci, 33: 75-278.
Runyan, S. 1962. Early development of the clingfish, Gobiesox strumosus Cope,
Chesapeake Sci. 2 (3-4): 113-141.
Saksena, V.P. and E.B. Joseph. 1972. Dissolved oxygen requirements of newly-hatched
larvae of the striped blenny (Chasmodes bosquianus), the naked goby (Gobiosoma
bosci), and the skilletfish (Gobiesox strumosus). Chesapeake Sci. 13 (1):23-28.
Schultz, L.P. 1944. A revision of the American clingfishes, Gobiesocidae, with
descriptions of new genera and forms. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 96:44-77.
Used with permission. Article copyright retained by author.
|