Subject: RE: NANFA-L-- RE: New nanfa list
Ranger Bob:
Got it. No arguments from me. I have no trouble seeing both sides
Perhaps I should apologize for troubling those who do not agree.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
Well said, Todd. (this is Mrs. Ranger Bob)
I was itching to reply to Bob Sinclair yesterday but didn't want to
Sorry you can't make it for Bob's Fish Camp 2 this weekend. Although,
At 07:17 AM 8/31/04 -0400, you wrote:
----- Original Message -----
I don't think so either... And I don't necessarily think that's a bad
This is what the BOD intended to acheive... And with the exception of
Thanks
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Betsy
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: Wed Sep 29 2004 - 12:24:25 CDT
From: Bob Sinclair (rjs-in-silcom.com)
Date: Tue Aug 31 2004 - 10:46:19 CDT
of this little contretemps. Having no control over, or responsibility
for, the NANFA list (nos NANFA-L), I simply was expressing my view
that a different approach to the few "miscreants" might have been
preferable ... in the interest of maintaing peace, tranquility ... and
broader participation on the list.
I apologize for bothering whomever was bothered by my thoughts.
From: owner-nanfa-l-in-nanfa.org
Bob Culler
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 7:16 AM
To: nanfa-l-in-nanfa.org
Subject: Re: NANFA-L-- RE: New nanfa list <No Fish Content In This
Message>
I'm not the member in this household, but I usually get to the email first
and read them.
I like the list much better now.
continue the ruckus.
He wrote: 1) It is my impression that-in-least some formerly active
contributors
to the list felt they were harshly treated because they posted something
off topic; and
I don't think the problem was that those particular people posted
"something off topic". It was because a large percentage of what they
posted was off topic. It wasn't an occasional thing but happened every
week. oops. preaching to the choir.
we've had downpours the last two days. We're expecting Casper, his boy
Coby, and Chip.
From: "Bob Sinclair" <rjs-in-silcom.com>
> I conclude there is a connection between the new "rules & regulations"
> and the dramatic reduction in volume. Perhaps I'm wrong...but I don't
> think so.
>
thing
(nor do a greater _majority_ of current members who've voiced their
praise
OFF LIST). It's like a nice high protein diet without all the simple
carbs.
Just might seem empty for a bit because we're used to so much volume,
all
that mid-day and late night snacking we were doing :)
yesterday, that's what we've been getting.
Todd
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about
NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org . Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/archive/nanfa/guidelines.html. To subscribe,
/ unsubscribe, or get help, visit the NANFA email list home page and
/ archive-in-http://www.nanfa.org/archive/nanfa/.
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org . Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/archive/nanfa/guidelines.html. To subscribe,
/ unsubscribe, or get help, visit the NANFA email list home page and
/ archive-in-http://www.nanfa.org/archive/nanfa/.