Re: NANFA-- straw poll results
Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:49:21 EST

well I am new to nanfa. but I am a member. I think a while ago when the
vote was taken things were somewhat different than they are presently. I
think everything is presently running smoothly. I think if you were to take
the vote today, the membership would vote more toward leaving everything
alone as is. I am certainly happy with nanfa just as it is presently running.

george arndt
harvard, mass

In a message dated 1/5/01 4:57:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,

<< Subj: NANFA-- straw poll results
Date: 1/5/01 4:57:39 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: (Christopher Scharpf)
To: (NANFA Mailing List)

Hello, everyone. This e-mail reports the results of the "straw poll" I
regarding the issue of moderation or non-moderation of this list.

Disclaimer: My straw poll was not sanctioned or approved by NANFA's Board of
Directors. I conducted the poll and submit my findings solely as a concerned
member of NANFA and its e-mail community.

Acknowledgment: I thank the 34 list members who took the time to vote and
articulate their opinions.

And now to the results of the vote. Of the votes received:

22 said this list should be moderated.

10 said this is just fine the way it is.

2 said neither of the above, and presented other options.

Clearly, a majority of those responding -- 65% -- would like this list to be

(Approximately 110 other list members had no opinion on the matter, or
are content to lurk and judiciously apply the 'delete' key.)

What was unclear from some of your comments is exactly what you think
should entail. Is it someone who collects, reviews, and approves all e-mails
before they are sent to all list recipients? Or is it someone who
inconspicuously sits on the sidelines and referees only when the situation
for it? And, in
extreme cases, has the authority to boot someone off the list and forbid

Either way, what we need is a set of guidelines to help us establish what is
is not appropriate content and behavior for this list. I've been collecting
guidelines from other lists and hope to present a set soon.

Until then, I leave you with this thought contributed by one list member:

"Everything in moderation. Including moderation."

Christopher Scharpf
Baltimore >>

/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ For a digest version, send the command to
/ instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,