Re: NANFA-- Columbia trip gear

Todd Crail (
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:43:10 -0500

No argument Steffen, these are good _reasons_ when paired with the law, not
rationalizations. :)

I was specifically addressing the notion of collection because:
"But theeey do it tooooo!"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steffen Hellner" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: NANFA-- Columbia trip gear

> I think there is truth in both aspects. Surely an animal taken from the
> has no value for its population anymore directly. Indirectly it can help
> saving it by backing it up before a species or population is extinct. Of
> course, again, the target must be to preserve the species in the wild. But
> not solely.
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ For a digest version, send the command to
/ instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,