RE: NANFA-- fwd: Snakehead or bowfin? (Wildbulletin mailing

Hoover, Jan J ERDC-EL-MS (
Wed, 19 May 2004 11:56:05 -0500

>>>Exactly. I have a dwarf species that is trying hard to get over a half
in length. It is unlikely this specie would survive any where but places
cichlids can live. But in the states that have this ban, this specie is
included since it covers the entire group- channa and parachanna. When
pirhahna were banned in several states, why didn't they ban tetras too?<<<

>>>I'm not sure if these states ban *all* snakehead species, or just the
ones that can survive in their waters. (Other states are considering similar
bans, and may have done so already.)...To suggest that restrictions on
snakeheads will lead to restrictions or bans on all tropical aquarium fishes
is guilty of the same "sky is falling" mentality so often attributed to

Issues seldom addressed in such legislation, but desperately needed, are the
availability of sound environmental data for the species under
consideration, and the taxonomic acuity of importers, wholesalers, breeders,
and retailers.

For example, water temperatures provide barriers to dispersal and
reproduction of many introduced species -- BUT the temperature ranges of
many snakeheads are unknown or equivocal (e.g., "tropical" species [e.g.,
Channa maculata, the blotched snakehead] that have become acclimitized and
established in areas far north of their native range). Complicating
matters, is the previous lack of comprehensive taxonomic references for this
species-rich (> 25 spp.) group. Again, if you have any interest in
snakeheads, I urge you to read the recent "Biological Synopsis" by Walter
Courtenay and James Williams. It is EXCELLENT!

Tetras are "similar but different." Many taxa (silver dollars, pacu,
piranha, etc.) are species rich with similar morphologies making conclusive
identification of safe and dangerous species iffy-in-best (especially with
juveniles that dominate the commercial trade). With fish like these, a
broader group-level ban, or some restrictions, may be justified.
Conversely, some tetra taxa (neons, serpae, lemons, cave) are so
distinctive, and presumed safe, that a very broad group-level ban to include
them is not necessary.

Here is an example that has not received much attention (but probably will
in the very near future). There are two groups of species rich suckermouth
catfishes: Plecostomus or armadillo del rio (Hypostomus spp.) and sailfins
(Pterygoplichthys spp.). Both have established populations in the southern
US. Both have similar form and biology. Both are marketed as ornamanetals.
One group (Plecostomus spp.)has proven, so far, to be environmentally
innocuous, the other (sailfins) a major ecological threat. Both are
frequently confused with each other. I have exhibited a taxidermic specimen
of a sailfin to several groups of biologists and aquarists who confidently
identified it as a Plecostomus. Of greater concern - large-scale retailers
of tropical fish are selling thousands of sailfins and calling them

Check it out for yourself - go into a tropical fish store or pet shop - ask
for a Plecostomus and watch for a sailfin.

-- Jan Hoover
Vicksburg, MS
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ For a digest version, send the command to
/ instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,