Now, what happens if the EPA get's "re-prioritized", the boss' boss' boss says
"this is inconclusive" and then it has to stick that "we must study this more"
and development continues? Or even worse... "We find no issues with
development in this watershed" ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Stallsmith
So my cynicism is based on a feeling that this whole process is a feel-good
operation designed to disarm any serious questioning of the status quo.
Local groups like the Cahaba River Society are organizing people to
participate in this process and, for one thing, make any recommendations by
this Study legally binding. The meeting conveners didn't look happy at that
suggestion.... so the struggle continues.
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org