
Relationships Between Aquatic Plants and Reproduction of Fishes
By Jim Pitts
reprinted from American Currents, Jan.-Feb. 1976
Aquatic plants have long been associated as probably the most influential factors in
fish ecology. The direct and indirect influences plants have on the reproduction of fishes
was long overlooked, however, in discussion of the ecological contributors towards the
success of fishes.
PLANTS AS SPAWN INDUCERS
Ethologically fishes are involved in a number of stimulus-response reactions that
lead directly to the act of spawning. One of the stimuli that may be involved is the
presence of a particular flora. The action of plants as triggers in spawnings does not
seem to be a well studied area. Comment on just how and where the visual perception of
vegetation fits into the sequence of events leading to spawning seems to be lacking, It
seems evident that such a relationship must exist at least in some fish in that certain
species will not spawn in the absence of plant life. Many species actively seek plants to
reproduce in, (such is the case with many Cyprinidae).
Another area of spawn induction by plants is chemical in nature. This is more important
in the still water fishes than in stream dwellers. Decaying aquatic vegetation is
responsible for the release of many organic substances in the water some of which
influence the gonadal development of fishes. These are gonatropins, and certain fish
reared in water devoid of these hormones never develop mature sex organs (Scheel).
Oxygen content of the water may influence the breeding of soma species such those in
the genus Corydoras. The relationship between plants and oxygen in a body of standing
water is self evident.
AQUATIC PLANTS AS SPAWN RECEPTACLES
The roles of aquatic vegetation as receptacles for the eggs of fish could perhaps
be categorized in two way, one in which the plant remains unmodified by the spawning
fishes and another category in which the plant is in some way transported or modified.
Those plants that remain unchanged are usually receptacles for egg scattering species
of fishes. These fish, (cyprinids for example) swim into or over the clumps of plants
such as Elodea or Vallisneria and randomly scatter the eggs in furious
bursts. This often takes place in such shallow water that the backs of the fishes break
the surface. The closer the spawning occurs to the edge of the water, the less chance that
other species will venture to that depth to devour the eggs. The plants in which the eggs
settles serve several purposes. The most obvious is the role of hiding the eggs from the
predation of other fishes. Fine leafy plants such as Myriophyllum serve this end
well. Another form of protection is when the plants prevent the eggs from drifting out
into the depths of the body of water, by diffusing the action of the waves and current
near the shoreline. Those species of fish that lay semi or adhesive eggs are well
benefited by plants in that they anchor their eggs onto the leaves. This prevents the eggs
from falling to the bottom where they are more subject to be eaten by small invertebrates.
The eggs of fishes in dense growths of plants are further benefited by a more favorable
hydrochemical environment (Nikolsky 1963). Both live and dead plants help in this way, The
release of nitrates has a definite effect on the pH of a body of water. When decaying
plants release their nitrogenous organic compounds the water around them becomes soft and
acidic. In moderation this condition is necessary for the reproduction of many tropical
and sub-tropical fishes. There is evidence that C02 has influence on the enzyme
hatching mechanism of the killifishes which lay eggs directly on the plant.The other
common utilization of plants by nondestructive methods occurs when some fishes deposit
their eggs in nests that are hidden in thick growths of plants.
Under another category we find plants that are modified by the fish in some way in
order to facilitate a spawning site or nest. Some fishes such as the Cichlids and the
Centrarchids remove plant material from the spawning site in order to produce a more
sterile environment for their broods. Not only decaying vegetation, but also large rooted
plants are removed from the area in meticulous fashion by these intelligent fish. Other
nest builders assume a more positive relationship with aquatic plants. Probably the basic
documented case is that of the sticklebacks (Gasterateoidea). These relatives of the
seahorses carefully select and dislodge the appropriate plants and weave them into a
cylindrical nest in which spawning and early rearing of the fry occurs. The family of
Anabantids or labyrinth fishes also use bits and pieces of plants to weave into a thick
mat of bubbles that the male forms at the surface of the water. Amia calva, the bowfin, is
reported to build some type of nest utilizing plant materials (Nikolsky 1963).
ADVERSE AFFECTS OF AQUATIC PLANTS ON FISH REPRODUCTION
There is usually a definite competition that takes place in an aquatic community between
the algal and rooted plants for available space and nutrients (Bennett). The balance
between the two is delicate and the addition of excessive nutrients to the system favors
the overpopulation of the phytoplankton. Algal blooms occur and have definite adverse
affects on fish populations and their reproduction. The dense mats that are formed by the
blooms shade the bottom and eliminate the slower growing rooted vegetation. Aside from the
eradication of floral spawning sites, direct effects on the adults, eggs, and juveniles
occur. The introduction of toxins by the following genera of Cyanophycae is responsible
for many lake and pond fish kills: Aphanizomenon, Anabena, Nodularis, Coelosphaerium, and
Glaeotricha (Bennett 1963). Thick blankets of filamentous may also form. Pithophora,
Rhizonium, and Hydrodictyon may form blankets that entirely cover large bodies of water.
According to Bennett, "There is evidence that dense stands of submersed rooted
aquatic plants may bind up nutrient materials throughout the growing season so that they
are not available for production of phytoplankton and the organisms that feed upon
phytoplankton," This means that although fish hatches would be large, the chances for
larval survival would be greatly diminished. The table at the end of this paper shows the
data supporting this, Potomageton foliosus and P. nodosus were the plants
involved in this case.In relation to fishing lakes and ponds, over-production of plants is
usually frowned upon by management and fishermen. The survival rate of fishes beyond
forage size is inversely proportional to the size of the fishes that reach maturity.
A few aquatic plants are predacious on the fry of fishes. The most common of these is
probably the bladderworts (Utricularia) (Podinova 1959). The plant Aldrovandia also
utilizes the fish larvae as a source of nutrients. "The leaves of Aldrovandia fold
together to form a chamber, the interior of which is covered with hairs. When these hairs
touch an animal the leaf claps together and the animal is caught." (Nikolsky). These
plants also reduce the amount of planktonic crustaceans in the water around them and thus
decrease the chances for larval survival by removing one of its major food sources.
Bibliography
Bennett, G.W. (1962). Management of Artificial Lakes and Ponds,. New York, Reinhold
Publishing Corp.
Nikolsky, G.V. (1963). The Ecology of Fishes. New York. Academic Press.
Rodinova, L.A. (1959) The feeding of bladderwort on animals. Papers for Higher Schools,
ser. Biol. Sci. no, 3.
Scheel. J. (1968) Rivulins of the Old World. Jersey City, New Jersey. T.F.H.
Publications Inc.
Other Information Sources
Breder, C.M. and Rosen, D.E. (1966) Modes of Reproduction in Fishes. Garden City, New
York. Natural History Press.
Burroughes, R.D. (1973). The Sticklebacks, Tropical Fish Hobbyist, Vol. XXI, no. 9.
Gerking, S.D. (editor) (1966) The Biological Basis of Freshwater Fish Production, New
York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hall, G.E. (editor) (1971) Resevoir Fisheries and Limnology. Washington D.C., The
American Fisheries Society.
| Year |
Yield |
Area
of Open Water Not Filled with Vegetation |
Net-Fishing Intensity |
Angling Intensity |
| |
Pounds |
Per Cent of
1939 Yield |
Acres |
Per Cent of
1939 Area |
Net-Days |
Per Cent of
1939 Net- Fishing |
Man-Hours |
Per Cent of
1939 Angling |
| 1939 |
223.4 |
100.0 |
1.25 |
100 |
92 |
100.0 |
27.0 |
100.0 |
| 1940 |
200.2 |
89.6 |
0.95 |
76.0 |
182 |
197.8 |
36.3 |
134.4 |
| 1941 |
129.9 |
58.1 |
0.64 |
51.2 |
330 |
358.8 |
42.3 |
156.7 |
Used with permission. Article copyright retained by author.
|