Re: NANFA-L-- Niagara River gobies?

dlmcneely-in-lunet.edu
Tue, 05 Apr 2005 13:58:09 -0500

I'd be happy to offer my views, but I'm not sure that, as an
academician and one who's views differ from those of some other members
of the group, my views are welcome. At least that's one thing I
learned today.

David L. McNeely, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Langston University; P.O. Box 1500
Langston, OK 73050; email: dlmcneely-in-lunet.edu
telephone: (405) 466-6025; fax: 405) 466-3307
home page http://www.lunet.edu/mcneely/index.htm

"Where are we going?" "I don't know, are we there yet?"

----- Original Message -----
From: Derek Parr <derekparr-in-earthlink.net>
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2005 11:26 am
Subject: Re: NANFA-L-- Niagara River gobies?

> I'm new to this list as well as its subject matter, and I have to
> say that I'm not quite
> ready to end this thread yet. It has been very interesting and
> raises several
> interesting questions regarding this segment of the aquatic hobby.
> Please keep in mind
> that the questions I ask do not denote any opinion of mine. These
> are things I don't
> know... therefore I ask.
>
> Regarding the arguement against catching and responsibly keeping
> the alien species the
> round goby:
> One arguement is that they may escape even though one may be
> responsible due to
> life's general chaos. As illustrated by Dave's story about the
> idiot who released all
> those reptiles despite being told not to. And we've probably all
> come across people
> like that. But, with that in mind, are there not several
> varieties of fish and what not
> commonly in the aquarium trade that are just as dangerous? We all
> know about Florida
> and the Apple Snail as well as many other fish and aquatic plants
> they got infested
> everywhere. And of course aquatic plants are a big problem all
> over the country.
> Particularly with the popularity of ponds. So, assuming that
> there are several fish in
> the commercial trade as dangerous (are there? I just assume there
> are), then is saying
> that one must not touch the same as saying one must not keep any
> common aquarium fish?
> if not, why not?
>
> And of course since the laws are quite clear about this particular
> fish it makes this
> question mute, but as a theoretical question regarding fish in
> general I'd be interested
> in hearing more discussion and opinions on it.
>
> thanks,
>
> -derek parr
> central NC
> /------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> / This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
> / Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
> / reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information
> about NANFA,
> / visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
> / consistent with the guidelines as per
> / http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe,
> or get
> / help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
> / http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml
>
>
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml