> diversity (heterogenity) is a topic agreed on by most ecologists. It's just
> been troublesome to find a statistical metric to explain something as simple
> as:
>
> Habitat Type 1: 6/152, 9/144, 7/102 (species/individuals)
> Habitat Type 2: 4/10, 4/48, 3/29 (species/individuals)
>
> These are all tolerant species. These are all compromised systems. The
> perspective is from a human standpoint, and one that hopefully acts like a
> grade card on the reach of our ag activity in this area. More stable,
> robust fish community, less impact off the fields. We're trying to find a
> statistic to dimension words like "stable" and "robust".
Hmm, then you would need a chronological component, I would guess?
--Irate
"Mos' peoples is intell'gent" - Mudbone
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association (NANFA). Comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of NANFA. For more information about NANFA,
/ visit http://www.nanfa.org Please make sure all posts to nanfa-l are
/ consistent with the guidelines as per
/ http://www.nanfa.org/guidelines.shtml To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get
/ help, visit the NANFA email list home page and archive at
/ http://www.nanfa.org/email.shtml