Re: NANFA-- Comments on the Skeptical Environmentalist

Bruce Stallsmith (fundulus_at_hotmail.com)
Tue, 07 May 2002 20:36:59 -0400

<x-flowed>
Oh boy, Lomborg... This is a man who is blissfully and happily indifferent
to history, scientific discovery, and physical reality. If he had _any_
scientific grounding he'd be dangerous. Global warming? No problemo, it's
not happening and anyway we'll benefit from it. If Lomborg didn't exist,
he'd have to be invented by the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal.

But, your mileage may vary, as always.

--Bruce Stallsmith
Huntsville, AL, US of A

>From: "Mark Otnes" <markotnes_at_email.msn.com>
>Reply-To: nanfa_at_aquaria.net
>To: <nanfa_at_aquaria.net>
>Subject: NANFA-- Comments on the Skeptical Environmentalist
>Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:01:55 -0500
>
>Hello, for those of you who are familiar with Bjorn Lomborg's book The
>Skeptical Environmentalist and the contentious issues it has raised there
>is
>a forum for you to contribute to the discussion. Andrew Sullivan at
>www.andrewsullivan.com is hosting a forum about the issues and will have
>Lomborg himself posting his own thoughts and responding to some emails.
>
>At Sullivan's web sight, just scan or do a find on 'Lomborg' and you can
>get
>all of the information about the forum. I think its a good opportunity to
>get to the heart of some of these matters. I've read the book and I
>thought
>that it made some excellent points. There has been an enormous negative
>reaction by many in the environmental movement and the magazine Scientific
>American has gotten downright nasty. In fact the magazine itself got me
>interested in the book in the first place. Last January, Scientific
>American ran a 16 page article from four contributors as a rebuttal to the
>book. Obviously there are some raw nerves and some skewered sacred cows,
>but the issues raised in the book and by its detractors need to be examined
>seriously.
>
>Andrew Sullivan is a moderate conservative and appears to be genuinely
>undecided on the environmental issues and if anything he probably leans
>towards the environmentalist's positions.
>
>Mark Otnes
>Fargo ND
>/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
>/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
>/ Association"
>/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes
>Association
>/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
>/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
>/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
>/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
>/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page,
>http://www.nanfa.org
/-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
/"Unless stated otherwise, comments made on this list do not necessarily
/ reflect the beliefs or goals of the North American Native Fishes
/ Association"
/ This is the discussion list of the North American Native Fishes Association
/ nanfa_at_aquaria.net. To subscribe, unsubscribe, or get help, send the word
/ subscribe, unsubscribe, or help in the body (not subject) of an email to
/ nanfa-request_at_aquaria.net. For a digest version, send the command to
/ nanfa-digest-request_at_aquaria.net instead.
/ For more information about NANFA, visit our web page, http://www.nanfa.org
</x-flowed>